![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() |

|
| Microsoft windows 2003 error all error and bugs related to microsoft windows 2003 error |
![]() |
|
Configuring DFS Namespaces
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Posts: 18,715
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 10
IM:
|
Adding Namespace Servers When deploying domain-based namespaces, you can add additional namespace servers to host a namespace. This has several advantages:
Before showing how to add a namespace server to a namespace, let’s quickly review the scenario from my previous article:
Note that the Accounting namespace only has one namespace server at present (BOX162). Now let’s add BOX171 as an additional namespace server for this namespace. Click the Add Namespace Server link in the Action pane, or right-click on the namespace and select Add Namespace Server. Then browse to specify BOX171 as the additional namespace server for the Accounting namespace (Figure 2): Note that a folder named Accounting will now automatically be created on BOX171 and shared with the appropriate permissions (Read permission for Everyone). You can override this default behavior if you like by clicking Edit Settings. Now you have two namespace servers defined for the Accounting namespace. One of these servers is BOX162 in Vancouver and the other is BOX171 in Seattle. The question is, when a user in Seattle tries to access the namespace, which namespace server will it use? This brings us to our next topic—referrals. Configuring Referrals To understand the importance of configuring referrals in an enterprise environment, you first need to understand how DFS Namespaces works. Going back to our scenario above, let’s say a user named Bob Smith located in Vancouver (Default-First-Site) wants to access resources in the Accounts namespace, which is spread over (targeted to) servers located in both Vancouver and Seattle (Seattle-Site). Here’s what typically happens:
There are several ways this process can be configured however. For example, instead of using lowest cost for accessing targets outside the client’s site, you could specify that DFS never use targets outside the client’s site at all. This might be useful, for example, if all the shared resources needed by that site are found locally at that site (or replicated to that site—I’ll cover DFS Replication in a future article). To configure this, right-click on the namespace and select Properties, then switch to the Referrals tab and select the Exclude Targets option as shown in Figure 3: Alternatively, you could leave the namespace configured so referrals outside the client’s site are done using least cost (the default setting) and then override this setting for individual folder targets. For example, right-click on the Accounts Payable folder target, select the Referrals tab, and select the first checkbox as shown in Figure 4 below: Another way of fine-tuning referrals is to change the priority of the folder targets for a particular folder. Since a folder can have more than one folder target (this is usually used in conjunction with DFS Replication) there is a default ordering to how these targets are returned in a referral. You can override this default ordering by selecting the folder in the console tree, right-clicking one of the targets listed in the Details pane for this folder, selecting Properties, selecting the Advanced tab, and configuring the override settings as desired (Figure 5): For example, you could specify that a particular target is listed first in the referral, as shown in the figure above. Or you could specify it as last if the target is your “server of last resort” i.e. a standby server just in case everything else goes down. Finally, if your WAN links are unreliable, you might find your clients frequently accessing different targets for the same folder. This can be a problem, for by default, DFS caches referrals for a period of time (300 seconds or 5 minutes) so if a target server suddenly goes down the client will keep trying to connect to the target and give an error instead of making the resource available to the client from a different target. Eventually (by default after 300 seconds or 5 minutes) the referral will expire in the client’s cache and a new referral will be obtained to a target that is online and the client will be able to access the desired resource, but in the meantime the user may grow frustrated since (a) the user has to wait for the referral to expire and (b) after the referral expires and a new one is obtained, the referral may direct the client to access a remote target over the WAN link which is not an optimal situation. To prevent this from happening (especially non-optimal targets), you can configure client failback on the namespace (or on specific folders in your namespace) so that when the failed target comes back online the client will fail back to that target as its preferred target. This setting is also configured on the Referral tab as shown in Figure 4 previously. Conclusion In this article and the previous one we’ve looked at how to implement and configure DFS Namespaces, a new feature of Windows Server 2003 R2 that replaces part of the previous DFS component of Windows 2000 and Windows Server 2003. In future articles we’ll examine how to implement the other half of DFS in R2, namely the new DFS Replication component. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Configuring a Cisco ASA 5510 | ps3cheats | Security and Firewall Error ! | 1 | 25-Mar-2007 10:42 PM |
| Configuring a Cisco ASA 5510 | Anilrgowda | Security and Firewall Error ! | 1 | 25-Mar-2007 10:35 PM |
| Configuring and Using DFS Replication | Anilrgowda | Networking Error ! | 0 | 29-Dec-2006 04:19 AM |
| Implementing DFS Namespaces | Anilrgowda | Microsoft windows 2003 error | 0 | 27-Dec-2006 11:18 PM |
| Configuring and Using DFS Replication | Anilrgowda | Microsoft windows 2003 error | 0 | 27-Dec-2006 11:10 PM |