Error » Microsoft Error! » Microsoft Operating Systems Error » Microsoft windows vista error » Vista not playing nice with gamers

Microsoft windows vista error all errors related to microsoft windows vista

Post New Thread Reply
  Vista not playing nice with gamers
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-Feb-2007, 06:19 AM   #1 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Anilrgowda's Avatar

Posts: 18,715
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 10 Anilrgowda is on a distinguished road

IM:
Default Vista not playing nice with gamers

Windows Vista’s powerful new graphics engine may be one of its hallmark features, but it’s engendering complaints from a key segment of potential early adopters: hardcore gamers.
A small but significant number of games written for Windows XP either crash or creep along slowly on Vista, according to numerous complaints by game enthusiasts in online forums.
"Formatted PC, installed Vista, updated any drivers possible. Now half [of my] games will not run, or run with corrupt graphics," lamented one poster on Jan. 31 in a discussion forum at graphics chipmaker Nvidia Corp.’s Web site.
"You installed Vista. You deserve your problems. Heh," replied a second poster.
Most of the problems have been found in popular first-person shooter games such as CounterStrike, Half-Life 2, Doom 3 and F.E.A.R.
Games, especially first-person shooters, tend to strain a PC’s graphics capabilities much more than business or even multimedia applications.
Besides the occasional crash, the most common reports appear to be games whose animation speed, measured in frames per second, suffers under Vista.
Experts blame still-flaky software drivers, Vista’s complexity and a dearth of new video cards optimized for Vista’s new rendering technology, DirectX 10.
That’s despite promises from Microsoft that Vista is backwards-compatible with XP’s graphic engine, DirectX 9, and that it will support existing games.
Meanwhile, games written to take advantage of DirectX 10 have been slow to emerge. And one Nvidia executive predicts that gamers may not routinely see games optimized for DirectX 10 until mid-2008.
It’s not that bad, says Microsoft
Chris Donahue, manager of Microsoft’s Games for Windows group, says the company has tested 1,000 popular games from the past five years. Most work well with Vista, he said, declining to elaborate how many had problems and why.
Vista’s DirectX 10 is reportedly a complete rewrite of Microsoft’s graphic engine that should allow games written for the platform to run much faster and display more textured, lifelike images than under DirectX 9.
DirectX 10 is so advanced that even Vista’s advanced desktop interface, dubbed "Aero," relies on the previous-generation DirectX 9 technology.
Leading game publishers such as Electronic Arts Inc., PopCap Games Inc., Vivendi Games, THQ Inc., Slam Games and WildTangent Inc. are busily creating games taking advantage of DirectX 10, according to Microsoft. Microsoft, through its MSN Games group, is also releasing a number of less graphically-intensive "casual" games for Vista.
But so far, Microsoft has only shown off -- and only via screenshots and video clips -- a handful of games that truly take advantage of DirectX 10. And many of those improvements appear to be subtle ones that only the most avid gamers will notice.
Nvidia on the hot seat
Besides complaining to Microsoft, users are compiling lists of games that do and do not work on Vista, such as the collections at zetafleet.com(download PDF), compatdb.org and NTcompatible.com.
Graphics chipmakers such as Nvidia Corp., Intel Corp., and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. subsidiary ATI Technologies Inc. are rolling out drivers for existing graphics cards running their chips.
But chipmakers are being criticized because of the slow appearance of those drivers, as well as their unreliability -- even those that have been certified by Microsoft’s Windows Hardware Quality Labs (WHQL).
Moreover, graphics chips optimized for DirectX 10 have yet to emerge from Intel or ATI, though the latter is expected to ship its first DirectX 10 processor, the R600, by midspring, according to unconfirmed reports.
Santa Clara, Calif.-based Nvidia has released a processor for DirectX 10, the GeForce 8800. The drivers for the GeForce 8800, however, remain in beta and are not WHQL-certified.
Some users are so disgruntled that they have created a Web site threatening a lawsuit.
"Our [quality assurance staffers] didn’t expect there to be an extraordinary number of bugs, but people are hammering pretty hard on Vista, and there are obviously some parts that we missed," said Daniel Vivoli, senior vice president for marketing at Nvidia.
While pointing out that other vendors such as mouse and keyboard maker Logitech International SA, sound card maker Creative Technology Ltd. and Cisco Systems Inc., as well as its wireless print server subsidary, Cisco-Linksys LLC, have also gotten complaints for malfunctioning Vista drivers, Vivoli acknowledged that Nvidia deserves the criticism it is receiving.Early adopters of Vista are the PC enthusiasts, and that’s where we have 90% market share, so it’s not surprising we get more heat than ATI," he said.
In response, Nvidia has created a page where users can directly report any problems with Vista drivers.
It is also devoting heavy resources to fixing those drivers until "everyone is delighted," Vivoli said.
Games slow to level up
So when will Vista-optimized games arrive?
Besides driver problems, the lack of DirectX 10 video cards on the market so far has prevented game publishers from rushing to the new technology. Even Halo 2, Microsoft’s massive hit for the Xbox that it is busily porting over for a release later this year on Windows Vista, will still be based on XP’s DirectX 9 technology. That is changing. Nvidia said it plans to have an entire "top-to-bottom" family of GeForce 8800 chips by the end of the year.
Microsoft’s Donahue, citing unnamed forecasters, predicted that up to 9 million DirectX 10 graphic cards or chip sets will be on the market by the end of this year.
Microsoft is also working closely with game developers to train them in DirectX 10, though it is stopping short of offering financial incentives to move to the new platform.
"I’d be very surprised to see any games that hit the market from this point forward straight out not support Windows Vista," he said.
But others equally plugged into game developers doubt such a quick timetable.
"DirectX 10 is a different way of programming. It’s harder," Nvidia’s Vivoli said. "I think it will take 12 to 18 months before we start to see all of the gaming titles coming out on DirectX 10."

Source:Vista not playing nice with gamers
Anilrgowda is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
   


   
Post New Thread Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

DMCA Policy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228