![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() |

|
| Mozilla firefox error all error and bug related to Mozilla firefox |
![]() |
|
Firefox Also Vulnerable to Windows Cursor Exploit
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Fixed Error!
Posts: 4,202
Join Date: Mar 2007
Rep Power: 6
IM:
|
Alexander Sotirov, the vulnerability researcher at Determina who discovered the ANI flaw last December and notified Microsoft of it later that month, yesterday posted a demonstration of an ANI exploit that hijacks a PC when Firefox users are conned into visiting a malicious site. Microsoft today issued a patch for the exploit. "It turns out that Firefox uses the same vulnerable Windows component to process .ani files, which can be exploited in a way similar to Internet Explorer," Sotirov said during the demo. Demonstration He showed how both IE7 and Firefox 2.0, when run on a Vista-powered PC, can be hijacked by an attack using the ANI exploit he created in December as a vulnerability proof-of-concept, which he also shared with Microsoft's security team. When the attack was run against IE 7, the ANI exploit gave access to all files on the system. "However, we cannot alter any system files" because of IE's protected mode, which is enabled by default in Vista, said Sotirov. Vista's version of IE7 runs in a low-privilege mode--dubbed "protected mode" by Microsoft--that blocks disk write access to all but a temporary files folder. An identical attack against Firefox 2.0, however, gave Sotirov complete and total access to the PC's drive. "Since Firefox does not have a low-privilege mode, similar to the protected mode in IE, we'll be able to overwrite files as well," he said. Firefox Definitely Vulnerable Third-party security vendors have claimed that Firefox 2.0 is not vulnerable. In a threat alert to its DeepSight customers, Symantec flatly stated "Mozilla Firefox is not vulnerable to the vulnerability." Not so, said Sotirov. "The reason for the confusion over Firefox is that an exploit that works against it has not become public. So in a sense, since there are no attacks in the wild [that work in Firefox], it is safer. But people should also consider that the bad guys will figure out how to exploit Firefox." Mozilla did not respond to requests for comment about Firefox's risk of exploitation, or confirmation that it is vulnerable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|