![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
![]() |

|
| Search Engine Optimization search engine optimization discussion. |
![]() |
|
Google Delisting: Lessons Learned
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
Posts: 18,715
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 10
IM:
|
In the course of a couple days I researched what I thought had caused the delisting, posted a plea for help, and took corrective action. Thankfully a few very helpful people pointed me in the right direction and I figured out the rest from there. I opened up a Google Sitemaps account, uploaded a sitemap, and submitted a reinclusion plea. At the time I thought the main cause was a javascript re-direct I had set up that pointed a closed blog of mine to The Disney Blog. The blog host service I use, Typepad, doesn't support 301-redirects, so I used the javascript redirect instead. To solve that problem, I turned off the redirect and password protected the archived blog. I also took the delisting as an opportunity to domain map my old domain thedisneyblog.typepad.com to the shorter www.thedisneyblog.com domain. That's something I should have done a lot earlier, but since Typepad doesn't allow 301-redirects, I was worried about the damage it could cause to my pagerank/quality rank. Once you're delisted, that's no longer a problem. I also asked as many people as I could to update their links to reflect the new shorter domain. As it turns out Typepad does something worse in my opinion. They allow both URLS (name.typepad.com and www.name.com) to resolve rather than directing one to the other. So a visitor/bot following a link to the old domain will still see it as an existing site and index it, rather than be transferred to the new domain. [aside: another problem with Typepad is that you have to host your blog in a subfolder. So Technorati and others end up tracking 'two' versions of your blog based on how people like to you (full URL or short). One at the short domain (www.thedisneyblog.com) and one at (www.thedisneyblog.com/tdb/). There appears to be no resolving the two into one on Technorati's end. So it's up to Typepad to figure it out. Perhaps allow their 'Pro' level users the ability to use subdomains for their domain mapped blogs instead of folders or 'root' level blogs with multiple domain names (as well as they way they have it now).] About 28 days after I was delisted, and about 25 days after I submitted the plea for reinclusion, I was magically back in the Google Index (with both URLs showing in searches). I must have done something right. But there was no word from Google on what had gone wrong in the first place, so the delisting could have just been an error. The traffic I received was still lower than what I had been getting. It took submitting a few more complete sitemaps, a return of my previous pagerank (actually, I think I still might be down one number from pre-August), and some popular posts to finally return traffic to the previous levels. That was about sometime in November 2006. December '06 was a very good month, thanks in large part to the Scary Mary video. Then last week on Friday January the 5th, I'm checking my stats and notice a sudden traffic drop-off. I logged in immediately to Google Webmaster Tools and my suspicions were correct, I was out of the index. But strangely there was no notice explaining that I had been dropped, just a generic message saying the site was not in the index. It took a few days for that notice to change to something that said I'd actually done something wrong (but didn't specify what). In early December I had closed one blog (Movieland) and merged those posts into The Disney Blog. But I left the old blog up as a reference until I could get to manually forwarding each post. So my mind immediately turned to that as the culprit based on my experience in August. I took swift corrective action and submitted a plea for reinclusion on Friday night. I also posted a headsup to my readers that The Disney Blog had been delisted again. It was a good thing I made that post. Because what I thought was wrong wasn't it. I suspect The Disney Blog made it back into the index in August due to a combination of factors that included the domain mapping and time. For whatever reason Google only delists you for 30 days or so before you re-enter the index. Since I had submitted a sitemap with a new domain that already had people linking to it, I was reindexed no questions asked. This time, when I made the plea for help a few SEO experts were listening and posted about my plight on their blogs. In turn, someone from Google read those posts and then made the extra effort to post a comment on my blog explaining exactly what was happening. Turns out that the real problem was hidden text that GoogleBot considered spammy. The truth is, I knew about this hidden text but considered it a feature of Typepad. Since meta-tags are often ignored by indexing bots, having a div tag that holds a description of your website in an H level markup seemed like a great idea. It was only hidden because I had chosen an option in Typepad that let me use an image instead of text for my header. It was only two lines of text and it wasn't trying to spam keywords or anything. It was the actual description of the website. Useful information for an index bot as far as I'm concerned. Anyway, I removed that hidden text from the blog. Emailed Six Apart/Typepad and let them know that Google cracked down on me for something they offer as a standard feature and let Google know that they might end up delisting 400,000 or so blogs for the same reason. As of the morning of Tuesday January 9th, The Disney Blog was back in Google's index with numbers very similar to what I had prior to the delisting. Whew. So what lessons have I learned from this whole mess? I have never deliberately used any SEO tricks for The Disney Blog (being a blog that covers a very specific topic gets me ranked high enough in Google as it is) and since I'm not using the 'advanced templates' on Typepad, I can't add any meta-tags. I was trusting that the hidden div & h2 tag in Typepad's code met Google Quality Standards. I don't think even Typepad was aware that it didn't. So this tells me it was possibly some recent change in Googlebot's behavior (as some have suggested). Perhaps Webmaster tools should allow you to add a site description and prohibit the Googlebot from accessing certain directories there, since not all website owners have access to the robot.txt file, even on Google's on Google Pages tool. In the meantime, know what's in your template/raw html. Don't allow hidden text to sneak through. Google will find it. One of the points in the comment left by Google was that they did try and contact me via email a week before they delisted the site. If I had received that email I would have taken care of it immediately. Alas, the only emails they sent to were all su, webmaster, owner, help, info @ thedisneyblog.com. At no point did they look for contact info on the website itself, or use contact info I had provided through the Google Webmaster Tools or Google Analytics. So I've added an email for webmaster@domain.com, and I would recommend every blogger do the same. It would be nice if at the same time Google sends out the one-week warning, they also highlight the offending blog in the Webmaster Tools (and Google Analytics if that's being used too) and then also send an email to the account used to configure either of those tools. I think that would cover all the bases. I still don't know if the duplicate content was causing problems with the indexing. Perhaps that's not as big a sin as hidden text. I hope Typepad, Technorati, and Google can get together and figure out how to have just one site from a blog show up in their respective indexes no matter if it's domain mapped, forwarded, hosted in a folder or at the root, or via RSS. Conclusion: Turns out that on the internet, what you don't know can hurt you. But thankfully, if you can make yourself heard via your blog, then you can attract the support of others and find solutions. I want to thank everyone who has contacted me or offered to lend a hand. You are very much appreciated. Please let me know if you have any further questions and I'll try and answer them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|